生态环境修复费用问题研究——基于《民法典》第1234条、1235条的辨析
Loading...
Date
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Abstract
《中华人民共和国民法典》在第1234条规定了生态环境修复责任，在第1235条明确生态环境损害的赔偿责任。对比两项规定，发现二者均涉及生态环境修复费用的金钱责任。但两条文在性质、目的等方面存在明显差异。正确理解两条文中生态环境修复费用的内涵和适用逻辑，对解决实践中聚焦金钱支付弱化实际修复等问题具有重要意义。 第一章是对引用第1234条、1235条案件的实证分析。通过裁判文书统计结果，发现司法实践中存在过分依赖包括生态环境修复费用在内的金钱责任作为生态环境损害责任承担方式、生态环境修复费用的性质和范围模糊不清、生态环境修复费用和其他金钱责任混同、第1234条及1235条引用标准模糊、生态环境修复...
The Civil Code of the People's Republic of China establishes liability for ecological environmental restoration and compensation for ecological environmental damage in Article 1234 and Article 1235. A comparison of this two articles reveals that they both deal with the pecuniary liability for ecological environmental restoration costs, but there are obvious differences between the two articles in ...
The Civil Code of the People's Republic of China establishes liability for ecological environmental restoration and compensation for ecological environmental damage in Article 1234 and Article 1235. A comparison of this two articles reveals that they both deal with the pecuniary liability for ecological environmental restoration costs, but there are obvious differences between the two articles in ...